AI Literacy Series at the Downtown Branch

Public Library — Downtown Branch · 2025

Background

The rapid proliferation of AI tools in everyday life created an urgent need for accessible, community-centered education. Many library patrons encountered AI through search engines, writing assistants, and customer service chatbots but lacked a framework for understanding how these tools worked or how to evaluate their outputs.

As a librarian with a deep commitment to digital literacy, I saw an opportunity to build something that did not yet exist in our system: a structured, approachable AI literacy program designed for the general public.

Approach

Curriculum Design

The curriculum was built around a three-tier framework:

  1. Awareness — Understanding what AI is and where it appears in daily life
  2. Evaluation — Learning to critically assess AI-generated content and recognize bias
  3. Participation — Hands-on practice using AI tools productively and ethically

Each session combined brief instruction with guided hands-on activities. Materials were designed to be accessible to participants with varying levels of technical comfort.

Community Partnerships

I partnered with local nonprofits and community organizations to promote the series and ensure it reached underserved populations. Bilingual outreach materials were developed to extend access to Spanish-speaking community members.

Outcomes & Impact

The program exceeded expectations across every metric we tracked. Participant feedback consistently highlighted the approachable, non-intimidating format as a key differentiator from other technology education they had encountered.

Most significantly, the program has been adopted by additional branches within the library system. The curriculum materials, session plans, and outreach templates I developed are now being used as a blueprint for AI literacy programming system-wide.

Lessons Learned

The most important lesson was that AI literacy education works best when it starts from where people actually are, not where we think they should be. Many participants arrived with anxiety about AI. Meeting that anxiety with curiosity rather than dismissal made all the difference.